P0 · Energy land workflow

Assemble the energy research around one legal description.

A tract lookup should answer the next land question, not make a landman open another portal for every layer. Start with the legal description, then review wells, operators, leases, royalties, pipelines, orphaned wells, and constraints in one evidence-backed report.

Built for landmen, operators, mineral acquisition teams, royalty investors, attorneys, and energy developers.

Workflow

Start with the location. End with evidence your team can use.

  1. 1Enter a PLSS legal description or Texas land description.
  2. 2Confirm the resolved section, tract, or abstract on the map.
  3. 3Review nearby wells, operators, leases, production, pipelines, and orphaned assets.
  4. 4Check federal mineral, split-estate, environmental, and siting context where included.
  5. 5Export the report or use the API response in a land workflow.
Output

The useful unit is the completed research job.

Each result keeps the land identity and the source context together, so a reviewer can see what was found, where it came from, and what still needs professional judgment.

Activity around the tract

Nearby wells, operators, status, production context, and drilling activity.

Lease and mineral context

Federal leases, royalty context, split-estate flags, and land interests where available.

Surface diligence

Pipelines, orphaned wells, FracFocus disclosures, habitat, and siting constraints.

Sample response

A concrete artifact beats a layer list.

This example shows the shape of the work. Values are illustrative and should not be treated as a live result until the source records are retrieved for the requested location.

{
  "system": "PLSS",
  "legal_location": "T39N R67W Sec 14",
  "state": "Wyoming",
  "energy": {
    "wells": { "total": 4, "active": 3 },
    "operators": ["Example Operating LLC"],
    "federal_leases": 1,
    "orphaned_wells": 0,
    "pipelines_within_radius": 2
  },
  "evidence": { "sources": ["BLM MLRS", "USGS", "HIFLD"] }
}

Questions this workflow should answer

Put one real workflow in front of the team.

Start with one tract, corridor, or assignment. Then decide which repeatable work deserves a deeper integration.

Open the Energy pack